Opinion
2:20-CV-01955-KJD-VCF
08-21-2023
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC. et al., Defendants.
Scott E. Gizer, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 12216 sgizer@earlysullivan.com Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365 slau@earlysullivan.com EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP Kevin S. Sinclair, NV Bar No. 12277 ksinclair@sinclairbraun.com SINCLAIR BRAUN KARGHER LLP Attorneys for Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY DESIGNATED LOCAL COUNSEL FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP PER L.R. IA 11-1(b) Janet Trost, Esq.
Scott E. Gizer, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 12216 sgizer@earlysullivan.com Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365 slau@earlysullivan.com EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP
Kevin S. Sinclair, NV Bar No. 12277 ksinclair@sinclairbraun.com SINCLAIR BRAUN KARGHER LLP Attorneys for Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY DESIGNATED LOCAL COUNSEL FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP PER L.R. IA 11-1(b) Janet Trost, Esq.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND OPPOSE COUNTERMOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF Nos. 45, 61) SECOND REQUEST
KENT J. DAWSON, UNITED STATESDISTRICTJUDGE
COMES NOW defendant Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”) and plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, which hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. On May 22, 2023, Fidelity filed its motion to dismiss (ECF No. 45);
2. On July 17, 2023, U.S. Bank filed its opposition to Fidelity's motion (ECF No. 60) and filed a countermotion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 61);
3. On July 27, 2023, the Court granted the Parties first stipulation to continue the deadline on Fidelity's reply in support of motion to dismiss and opposition to countermotion such that both are currently due on August 21, 2023 (ECF No. 63);
4. Fidelity requests a three-week extension of its deadline to reply in support of its motion to dismiss and to oppose U.S. Bank's countermotion for partial summary judgment, through and including Monday, September 11, 2023 to afford Defendants' counsel additional time to review and respond to U.S. Bank's opposition and countermotion;
5. Counsel for U.S. Bank does not oppose the requested extension;
6. This is the second request for an extension made by counsel for Fidelity, which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED that Fidelity's deadline to reply in support of its motion to dismiss and respond to U.S. Bank's countermotion are hereby extended through and including Monday, September 11, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED.