From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Bank v. Fid. Nat'l Title Grp.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 1, 2023
2:21-cv-01454-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 1, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01454-JCM-NJK

02-01-2023

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE FOR TRUMAN 2016 SC6 TITLE TRUST, Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC.; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; DOE INDIVIDUALS I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS XI through XX, inclusive, Defendants.

SINCLAIR BRAUN, LLP, Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq., Attorneys for Defendants, Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. and Fidelity National Title Insurance Company WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP, Darren T. Brenner, Esq., Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq., Attorneys for Plaintiff, U.S. Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2016 SC6 Title Trust


SINCLAIR BRAUN, LLP, Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq., Attorneys for Defendants, Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. and Fidelity National Title Insurance Company

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP, Darren T. Brenner, Esq., Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq., Attorneys for Plaintiff, U.S. Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2016 SC6 Title Trust

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC.'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [ECF NO. 58] (SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiff, U.S. Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2016 SC6 Title Trust (“U.S. Bank”) and Defendant Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. (“Fidelity”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On December 21, 2022, Fidelity filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [ECF No. 58];
2. U.S. Bank's deadline to respond to Fidelity's Motion is currently February 3, 2023 [ECF No. 61];
3. The Parties stipulate and agree that U.S. Bank shall have an additional 31 days to respond to Fidelity's Motion through and including Monday, March 6, 2023 as U.S. Bank needs additional time to review and respond to the cited points and authorities;
4. Counsel for Fidelity does not oppose the requested extension;
5. This is the second request for an extension which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. Bank v. Fid. Nat'l Title Grp.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 1, 2023
2:21-cv-01454-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 1, 2023)
Case details for

U.S. Bank v. Fid. Nat'l Title Grp.

Case Details

Full title:U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE FOR TRUMAN 2016 SC6…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 1, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-01454-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 1, 2023)