From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Bank v. Crockett

Supreme Court of New York
Jan 12, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 212 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)

Opinion

No. 2019-03840 Index No. 516625/16

01-12-2022

U.S. Bank N.A., etc., appellant, v. Gerard Crockett, respondent.

Friedman Vartolo LLP, Garden City, NY (Zachary Gold of counsel), for appellant. Solomon Rosengarten, Brooklyn, NY, for respondent.


Submitted - October 21, 2021

Friedman Vartolo LLP, Garden City, NY (Zachary Gold of counsel), for appellant.

Solomon Rosengarten, Brooklyn, NY, for respondent.

ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P. CHERYL E. CHAMBERS ROBERT J. MILLER WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Francois A. Rivera, J.), dated February 8, 2019. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred.

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred is denied.

The order is reversed insofar as appealed from for the reasons stated in the companion appeal (U.S Bank NA v Crockett, __A.D.3d __[Appellate Division Docket No 2018-11178; decided herewith])

IANNACCI, JP, CHAMBERS, MILLER and FORD, JJ, concur


Summaries of

U.S. Bank v. Crockett

Supreme Court of New York
Jan 12, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 212 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)
Case details for

U.S. Bank v. Crockett

Case Details

Full title:U.S. Bank N.A., etc., appellant, v. Gerard Crockett, respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of New York

Date published: Jan 12, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 212 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)