From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Bank v. Cokley

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 25, 2021
20-CV-00381 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-00381 (PMH)

08-25-2021

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2016-CTT, Plaintiff, v. EARL W. COKLEY, Defendant.


ORDER

PHILIP M. HALPERN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On June 4, 2021, Plaintiff moved for summary judgment. (Doc. 32). Pursuant to the Court's April 30, 2021 Order, Defendant's opposition to Plaintiffs motion was due by June 25, 2021. (Doc. 22). To date, Defendant has not filed opposition to the motion or sought any extension of time to do so.

The Court sua sponte extends Defendant's time to oppose the motion for summary judgment to September 17, 2021. Plaintiffs reply, if any, is due October 1, 2021.

If Defendant fails to file opposition by September 17, 2021, the motion will be deemed fully submitted and unopposed. No further extensions of time will be granted.

Dated: White Plains, New York August 25, 2021

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. Bank v. Cokley

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 25, 2021
20-CV-00381 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2021)
Case details for

U.S. Bank v. Cokley

Case Details

Full title:U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 25, 2021

Citations

20-CV-00381 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2021)