From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Rudick

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 29, 2019
172 A.D.3d 1431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2018–01291 Index No. 604853/15

05-29-2019

U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., etc., Appellant, v. Samuel RUDICK, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Day Pitney LLP, New York, N.Y. (Christina A. Parlapiano and Richard J. Galati, Jr., of counsel), for appellant. Young Law Group, PLLC, Bohemia, N.Y. (Ivan E. Young and Justin Pane of counsel), for respondent.


Day Pitney LLP, New York, N.Y. (Christina A. Parlapiano and Richard J. Galati, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Young Law Group, PLLC, Bohemia, N.Y. (Ivan E. Young and Justin Pane of counsel), for respondent.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P., JOSEPH J. MALTESE, HECTOR D. LASALLE, BETSY BARROS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDERORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination in the companion appeal (see U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Rudick , 172 A.D.3d 1430, 102 N.Y.S.3d 66, 2019 WL 2274529 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2016–11116; decided herewith] ).

CHAMBERS, J.P., MALTESE, LASALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Rudick

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 29, 2019
172 A.D.3d 1431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Rudick

Case Details

Full title:U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., etc., Appellant, v. Samuel RUDICK, Respondent, et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 29, 2019

Citations

172 A.D.3d 1431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
99 N.Y.S.3d 702