From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Viola

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Feb 23, 2017
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-969 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 23, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-969

02-23-2017

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY L. VIOLA, et al., Defendants.


OPINION & ORDER
[Resolving Doc. 8] :

Defendant-Cross Claimant Anthony Viola moves for default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 against Defendants-Cross Defendants Chase Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase Bank") and Citibank (South Dakota) ("Citibank") for failure to plead or otherwise defend. On January 13, 2017, the Court dismissed the case as to Defendants Citibank and Chase Bank for want of prosecution by Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association. Because Citibank and Chase Bank are no longer parties to the case, Viola's motion for default judgment is moot. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant-Cross Claimant Viola's motion for default judgment.

Doc. 8.

Doc. 28. --------

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 23, 2017

s/ James S . Gwin

JAMES S. GWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Viola

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Feb 23, 2017
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-969 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 23, 2017)
Case details for

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Viola

Case Details

Full title:U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY L. VIOLA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Date published: Feb 23, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-969 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 23, 2017)