From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Roosild

Supreme Court of Washington.
Dec 1, 2021
198 Wash. 2d 1026 (Wash. 2021)

Opinion

No. 99895-7

12-01-2021

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Respondent, v. Tarmo ROOSILD and Samantha Castronovo, Petitioners.


ORDER

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice González and Justices Madsen, Stephens, Yu, and Whitener, considered at its November 30, 2021, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the petition for review is denied. The Respondent's motion for judicial notice, which was included in the answer to the petition for review, is denied. The Respondent's request for attorney fees for filing an answer to the petition for review is granted. The Respondent is awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.1(j). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), the Respondent should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.

For the Court

/s/ González, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Roosild

Supreme Court of Washington.
Dec 1, 2021
198 Wash. 2d 1026 (Wash. 2021)
Case details for

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Roosild

Case Details

Full title:U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Respondent, v. Tarmo ROOSILD and Samantha…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Dec 1, 2021

Citations

198 Wash. 2d 1026 (Wash. 2021)
498 P.3d 953