From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Gonzales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
No. CIV-S-10-2736 KJM KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-10-2736 KJM KJN PS

08-02-2011

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE LXS 2006-16N TRUST FUND, Plaintiff, v. MARLENE GONZALES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This is an action removed from state court by defendant, who is proceeding in pro per. On March 23, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

The court thus presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 23, 2001, are ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13) is DENIED; and

3. Plaintiff's motion to remand (ECF No. 4) is GRANTED and this entire case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento.

_____________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Gonzales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
No. CIV-S-10-2736 KJM KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Gonzales

Case Details

Full title:U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE LXS 2006-16N TRUST…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

No. CIV-S-10-2736 KJM KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)