From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Bank N.A. v. Crockett

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 12, 2022
201 A.D.3d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

2019-03840 Index No. 516625/16

01-12-2022

U.S. BANK N.A., etc., appellant, v. Gerard CROCKETT, respondent.

Friedman Vartolo LLP, Garden City, NY (Zachary Gold of counsel), for appellant. Solomon Rosengarten, Brooklyn, NY, for respondent.


Friedman Vartolo LLP, Garden City, NY (Zachary Gold of counsel), for appellant.

Solomon Rosengarten, Brooklyn, NY, for respondent.

ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, ROBERT J. MILLER, WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Francois A. Rivera, J.), dated February 8, 2019. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred.

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred is denied.

The order is reversed insofar as appealed from for the reasons stated in the companion appeal ( U.S. Bank N.A. v. Crockett, 201 A.D.3d 767, ––– N.Y.S.3d –––– [Appellate Division Docket No. 2018–11178 ; decided herewith]).

IANNACCI, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and FORD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

U.S. Bank N.A. v. Crockett

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 12, 2022
201 A.D.3d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

U.S. Bank N.A. v. Crockett

Case Details

Full title:U.S. BANK N.A., etc., appellant, v. Gerard CROCKETT, respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 12, 2022

Citations

201 A.D.3d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
156 N.Y.S.3d 917