From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Poppin

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 8, 2006
No. CIV S-04-2458 DFL KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-2458 DFL KJM PS.

February 8, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On December 5, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. In addition, defendant Gregory Nicholas Poppin filed a motion to stay the proceedings.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 5, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment is granted;

3. Defendant Poppin's motion to stay the proceedings is denied;

4. The court approves the proposed judgment filed by plaintiff on November 30, 2005; and,

5. Judgment shall enter.


Summaries of

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Poppin

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 8, 2006
No. CIV S-04-2458 DFL KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Poppin

Case Details

Full title:U.S. BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. GREG POPPIN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 8, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-04-2458 DFL KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2006)