From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Bancorp v. Solutran, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 8, 2016
2016-1302 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2016)

Opinion

2016-1302

08-08-2016

U.S. BANCORP, Appellant v. SOLUTRAN, INC., Appellee

DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHELLE DAWSON. ROBERT JAMES GILBERTSON, Greene Espel, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by SYBIL LOUISE DUNLOP.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2014-00076.

JUDGMENT

DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHELLE DAWSON. ROBERT JAMES GILBERTSON, Greene Espel, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by SYBIL LOUISE DUNLOP. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 8, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

U.S. Bancorp v. Solutran, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 8, 2016
2016-1302 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2016)
Case details for

U.S. Bancorp v. Solutran, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:U.S. BANCORP, Appellant v. SOLUTRAN, INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 8, 2016

Citations

2016-1302 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2016)

Citing Cases

Solutran, Inc. v. U.S. Bancorp

Id. Upon finding that U.S. Bank had failed to prove that Claim 1 was obvious, the PTAB also rejected U.S.…

Solutran, Inc. v. U.S. Bancorp

Defendants did appeal the PTAB's decision to the Federal Circuit, which summarily affirmed. See U.S. Bancorp…