From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ursino v. Hagarty

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2006
No. Civ S-05-1764 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)

Opinion

No. Civ S-05-1764 DFL KJM P.

August 3, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On April 14, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff did not file objections to the findings and recommendations.

On June 16, 2006, the court adopted the findings and recommendations and entered judgment, dismissing the case without prejudice.

On June 27, 2006, plaintiff filed a "Request To Reconsider," which the court will treat as a motion for relief from judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1). Plaintiff claims he did not receive the April 14, 2006 findings and recommendations.

Good cause appearing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The judgment entered June 16, 2006 is hereby vacated;

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the April 14, 2006 findings and recommendations; and

3. Plaintiff's objections to the findings and recommendations are due within twenty days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Ursino v. Hagarty

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2006
No. Civ S-05-1764 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)
Case details for

Ursino v. Hagarty

Case Details

Full title:JAMES URSINO, Plaintiff, v. POLICE CHIEF HAGARTY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 3, 2006

Citations

No. Civ S-05-1764 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)