Urrea v. Flythe

2 Citing cases

  1. Black v. Knight

    231 Ga. App. 820 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 12 times

    Appellant filed a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, asserting that this was not a suit which could properly be re-filed. The trial court denied her motion, under authority of Hobbs v. Arthur, 264 Ga. 359 ( 444 S.E.2d 322) and Urrea v. Flythe, 215 Ga. App. 212( 450 S.E.2d 266). Barbara Black appeals. Held:

  2. In re Estate of Hanson

    353 Ga. App. 61 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 2 times

    Accordingly, we vacate the trial court's order appointing the parents as the permanent co-guardians and co-conservators for Kevin and remand for the trial court to consider each of the significant connection factors in OCGA § 29-11-10 and to address the factors in OCGA § 29-11-12 (2) (B) (i) through (iii). See, e.g., Urrea v. Flythe , 215 Ga. App. 212, 213, 450 S.E.2d 266 (1994) (reversing and remanding case to the trial court "to determine whether appellant has met the necessary jurisdictional prerequisites for filing a renewal suit"). 2.