From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Urquiaga v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 12, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-2307 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 12, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-2307

12-12-2012

JOSE URQUIAGA, Petitioner v. JANET NAPOLITANO, et al., Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2012, upon consideration of the report and recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Mannion (Doc. 13), to which no objections have been filed, and upon independent review of the record, the court finds no error in the R&R and concludes that the R&R should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The R&R (Doc. 13) is adopted.
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED as MOOT.
3. The Clerk of Court shall close this file.

_____________

William W. Caldwell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Urquiaga v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 12, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-2307 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Urquiaga v. Napolitano

Case Details

Full title:JOSE URQUIAGA, Petitioner v. JANET NAPOLITANO, et al., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 12, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-2307 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 12, 2012)