From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Urias-Reyes v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2012
472 F. App'x 734 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-70752 Agency No. A071-637-442

04-23-2012

JAIME FELICIANO URIAS-REYES, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals


Submitted April 17, 2012

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
--------

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Jaime Feliciano Urias-Reyes, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying his motion to reopen and rescind his in absentia deportation order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Nor did the BIA abuse its discretion in denying Urias-Reyes' motion to reopen because it was filed more than eighteen years after his final order of deportation, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(iii)(A)(1), Urias-Reyes did not establish the due diligence required for equitable tolling, see Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 897, and Urias-Reyes' conceded in his declaration that he received notice of the August 6, 1991, hearing at which he was ordered deported in absentia. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Urias-Reyes v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2012
472 F. App'x 734 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Urias-Reyes v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:JAIME FELICIANO URIAS-REYES, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 23, 2012

Citations

472 F. App'x 734 (9th Cir. 2012)