From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ureno v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2017
Case No. CV 16-09547 DSF (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-09547 DSF (RAO)

01-04-2017

JOSE URENO, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Memorandum and Order Dismissing Habeas Action Without Prejudice,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. DATED: 1/4/17

/s/_________

DALE S. FISCHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ureno v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2017
Case No. CV 16-09547 DSF (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2017)
Case details for

Ureno v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:JOSE URENO, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 16-09547 DSF (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2017)

Citing Cases

Warren v. State

In such a circumstance, the Court typically lacks jurisdiction to grant the sought extension and must dismiss…

In re State Habeas Corpus Stay or Abeyance as to Petitioner Juan Balderas

Courts have regularly concluded that they have no jurisdiction to grant extensions of time in this…