From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Urbano v. Hallenbeck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1914
163 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

April, 1914.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.


The facts disclosed in the complaint and affidavit, which are entirely undenied by the defendant, show a continual trespass in front of the plaintiff's premises and are sufficient to constitute a nuisance. Plaintiff was entitled to an injunction restraining such continual trespass and nuisance, and the order is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Urbano v. Hallenbeck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1914
163 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

Urbano v. Hallenbeck

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR URBANO, Appellant, v . HARRY C. HALLENBECK and U.T. HUNGERFORD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1914

Citations

163 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)