From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Urbano v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 5, 2011
Case No. 2:10-cv-02007-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cv-02007-EFB

10-05-2011

CARLOS URBANO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration DANIEL P. TALBERT Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

DANIEL P. TALBERT

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT

TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that the previously filed Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) application is hereby withdrawn.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY dollars and 0 cents ($5,750.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff, to date, by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412.

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Bess M. Brewer, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA.

Respectfully submitted October 4, 2011.

Respectfully submitted,

(As authorized via email)

BESS M. BREWER

Attorney for Plaintiff

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DANIEL P. TALBERT

Special Assistant U. S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant Michael J. Astrue

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Urbano v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 5, 2011
Case No. 2:10-cv-02007-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Urbano v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS URBANO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:10-cv-02007-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)