From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uranga v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Mar 11, 2014
Civil No. 7:11-CV-088-O-KA (N.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2014)

Opinion

Civil No. 7:11-CV-088-O-KA

03-11-2014

JOHN URANGA, III, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and of Petitioner's objections thereto, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for dismissal set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

__________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Uranga v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Mar 11, 2014
Civil No. 7:11-CV-088-O-KA (N.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2014)
Case details for

Uranga v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:JOHN URANGA, III, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director, Texas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 11, 2014

Citations

Civil No. 7:11-CV-088-O-KA (N.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2014)