From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Upshaw v. O'Bryant

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 6, 1960
115 S.E.2d 591 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)

Opinion

38313, 38314.

DECIDED JUNE 6, 1960.

Appellate procedure. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Guess. February 24, 1960.

Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee Hancock, Warner S. Currie, James R. Dollar, Jr., for plaintiff in error.

Bass, Burger, Kidd Rich, Casper Rich, contra.


Although the bills of exception recite that the plaintiff in error filed demurrers, both general and special, to the plaintiff's petitions and that the trial judge entered orders overruling "the within demurrers of defendant," the records show, upon inspection, that the only two grounds of demurrer filed in each case were special demurrers attacking the allegations of two paragraphs of each of the petitions on the ground that they were prejudicial, immaterial, irrelevant, surplusage, redundant and contradictory of other allegations contained in the petitions. The records showing these facts will control over the recitations in the bills of exception. Butler Ice Storage Co. v. Georgia Power Co., 49 Ga. App. 145 (1) ( 174 S.E. 479). It thus appears that the only judgments excepted to are the overruling of these special demurrers. Such orders are not final judgments, nor are they such as would have been final had they been rendered as contended by the plaintiff in error, and, therefore, the writs of error are premature and must be dismissed. Harrell v. Southern Ry. Co., 13 Ga. App. 409 ( 79 S.E. 240); Rowe v. Johnson, 88 Ga. App. 199 (1) ( 76 S.E.2d 429).

Writs of error dismissed. Gardner, P. J., Townsend and Frankum, JJ., concur.

DECIDED JUNE 6, 1960.


Summaries of

Upshaw v. O'Bryant

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 6, 1960
115 S.E.2d 591 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)
Case details for

Upshaw v. O'Bryant

Case Details

Full title:UPSHAW v. O'BRYANT, by Next Friend (two cases)

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 6, 1960

Citations

115 S.E.2d 591 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)
101 Ga. App. 781

Citing Cases

Smith v. A. A. Wood Son Company

Accordingly, we adjudge it unnecessary to pass upon this motion to amend the bill of exceptions, since the…

Johnson v. Housing Authority, City of Marietta

1. Where there is a conflict between the bill of exceptions and the record, the record controls. Smith v. A.…