From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uppal v. Nationstar Mortg.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Apr 29, 2020
300 So. 3d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2D18-3986

04-29-2020

Neelam T. UPPAL, Appellant, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellee.

Neelam T. Uppal, pro se. Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; and William P. Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.


Neelam T. Uppal, pro se.

Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; and William P. Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed. See Uppal v. Wells Fargo, 287 So. 3d 545, 545 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (citing Pridgen v. First Union Bank, 879 So. 2d 21, 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ("An order that merely schedules a foreclosure sale is not a final appealable order [or] an appealable nonfinal order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130.")).

LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Uppal v. Nationstar Mortg.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Apr 29, 2020
300 So. 3d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Uppal v. Nationstar Mortg.

Case Details

Full title:NEELAM T. UPPAL, Appellant, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 29, 2020

Citations

300 So. 3d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)