From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Unthank v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Sep 15, 2021
1:20CV616 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 15, 2021)

Opinion

1:20CV616

09-15-2021

ALONZO UNTHANK, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant.


ORDER

Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge

On August 18, 2021, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. 19) within the time limit prescribed by Section 636, and the Commissioner filed a response (Doc. 20).

The court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 17), which is affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 12) is DENIED, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 14) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.


Summaries of

Unthank v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Sep 15, 2021
1:20CV616 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Unthank v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO UNTHANK, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

1:20CV616 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 15, 2021)