From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Unterman v. Unterman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 16, 1951
279 App. Div. 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

October 16, 1951.

Present — Peck, P.J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.


On all the facts and circumstances disclosed, the trial court in the exercise of sound discretion should not have forced trial of defendant's defenses in the absence of plaintiff who had a reasonable excuse and thereafter should not have dismissed the complaint and granted judgment for defendant, although defendant had admitted the material allegations of the complaint. Order denying plaintiff's motion to open the default unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant, and plaintiff's motion granted and judgment of dismissal vacated and the case set down for trial at Special Term, Part III, at a date to be fixed in the order to be settled herein. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Unterman v. Unterman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 16, 1951
279 App. Div. 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Unterman v. Unterman

Case Details

Full title:ANNE UNTERMAN, Appellant, v. IRVING UNTERMAN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 16, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)