Unocal Pipeline Co. v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc.

Full title: Unocal Pipeline Co. v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., ConocoPhillips…

Court: COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Feb 15, 2015

Cause number: 01-15-00266-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 15, 2015)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-15-00266-CV

02-15-2015

Unocal Pipeline Co. v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., ConocoPhillips Transportation Alaska, Inc. and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co.

Evelyn V. Keyes

ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motions: Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Lara E. Romansic and Steven G. Reed Parties filing motions: Appellees BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., ConocoPhillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. Document to be filed: N/A Is appeal accelerated? No. Ordered that motions are:

[ ] Granted

[v] Denied

[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

[v] Other: __________

The motions to appear pro hac vice by non-resident attorneys Lara E. Romansic and Steven G. Reed are denied without prejudice to refiling with the required motions in support by a Texas resident attorney. See TEX. RULES GOVERN. BAR ADM'N, RULE XIX(b) (2015) ("The motion of the non-resident attorney seeking permission to participate in Texas proceedings must be accompanied by motion of the resident practicing Texas attorney with whom the non-resident attorney will be associated in the proceeding of a particular cause. . . .").

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

[×] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court
Date: February 15, 2015 November 7, 2008 Revision