From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Universal Underwriters v. Patriot Ambulette

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 10, 1989
149 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Summary

In Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Patriot Ambulette, Inc., 539 N.Y.S.2d 981 (App.Div. 2d Dep't 1989), the court found that the insured provided notice "as soon as practicable" where its five-month delay in notifying the insurer was due to its insurance broker's mistake.

Summary of this case from 105 Street Associates, LLC v. Greenwich Insurance

Opinion

April 10, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On May 29, 1981, a vehicle owned by the defendant and insured by the plaintiff was involved in an accident which resulted in serious injury to a passenger. Although the defendant immediately reported the accident to its insurance broker, thereafter the broker mistakenly notified the wrong insurance carrier, Liberty Mutual, of the claim due to the fact that the defendant had 3 vehicles, 2 insured by Liberty Mutual and 1 insured by the plaintiff. The error was not discovered and the plaintiff was not provided with written notice of the accident until some five months later. This notice was in the form of a State workers' compensation lien concerning the injured passenger. The plaintiff then sent a letter to the defendant, dated October 21, 1981, requesting that it complete a claim form. Upon receipt of this letter, the broker forwarded to the plaintiff the necessary documentation of the accident. The plaintiff now seeks a judgment declaring that it has no duty to defend or indemnify the defendant in connection with the personal injury action commenced by the injured passenger against it, inasmuch as the defendant failed to comply with the provision in the policy which required it to give written notice of any occurrence covered by the policy "as soon as practicable". We further note that there is uncontradicted testimony by the injured passenger that an investigator from the plaintiff visited her at her home approximately three months after the accident.

From this record we cannot conclude that the defendant's delay in providing written notice to the plaintiff of the occurrence of the accident was unreasonable as a matter of law but instead, find that the notice was provided "as soon as practicable" under the facts and circumstances of this case. In this regard we note that the plaintiff failed to produce the key witness on its behalf, namely, claims adjuster Kevin Kennedy. Accordingly, the plaintiff may not disclaim its duty under the policy (see, Mighty Midgets v. Centennial Ins. Co., 47 N.Y.2d 12; 8 Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice § 4734; 70 N.Y. Jur 2d, Insurance, § 1601 et seq.). Mangano, J.P., Lawrence, Spatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Universal Underwriters v. Patriot Ambulette

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 10, 1989
149 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

In Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Patriot Ambulette, Inc., 539 N.Y.S.2d 981 (App.Div. 2d Dep't 1989), the court found that the insured provided notice "as soon as practicable" where its five-month delay in notifying the insurer was due to its insurance broker's mistake.

Summary of this case from 105 Street Associates, LLC v. Greenwich Insurance

In Patriot Ambulette, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York found that a five-month delay in providing notice was not unreasonably late where the insured's broker originally sent notice to the wrong insurance company and the uncontradicted evidence showed that the correct insurer had actual notice of the underlying claim and had dispatched an investigator three months after the accident.

Summary of this case from IMC Global v. Continental Insurance
Case details for

Universal Underwriters v. Patriot Ambulette

Case Details

Full title:UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PATRIOT AMBULETTE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 10, 1989

Citations

149 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
539 N.Y.S.2d 981

Citing Cases

IMC Global v. Continental Insurance

Based on the record before us, we conclude the circuit court's finding that Mosaic's delay in notifying…

Sparacino v. Pawtucket Mut. Ins. Co.

Dovner Memo. of July 1, 1992, Jt.App. 171. As the court recognized in Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v.…