From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Universal Entm't Corp. v. Aruze Gaming Am., Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 27, 2022
2:18-CV-00585 (RFB)(NJK) (D. Nev. Oct. 27, 2022)

Opinion

2:18-CV-00585 (RFB)(NJK)

10-27-2022

UNIVERSAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation, Plaintiff, v. ARUZE GAMING AMERICA, INC., a Nevada corporation, KAZUO OKADA, an individual, Defendants. ARUZE GAMING AMERICA, INC., a Nevada corporation, KAZUO OKADA, an individual, Counter-Claimants, v. UNIVERSAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation, ARUZE USA, a Nevada corporation, and JUN FUJIMOTO, an individual, Counter-Defendants.

Jay J. Schuttert, Esq., David W. Gutke, Esq., EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT LLP, Bruce R. Genderson (pro hac vice), David M. Krinsky (pro hac vice), Adam D. Harber (pro hac vice), WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants David S. Krakoff (pro hac vice), Lauren R. Randell (pro hac vice), Adam Miller (pro hac vice) Preston Burton (pro hac vice) BUCKLEY LLP KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP, Jeffrey S. Love (pro hac vice), Kristin L. Cleveland (pro hac vice), Caroline L. Desmond (pro hac vice), Ryan L. Frei (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant Aruze Gaming America, Inc J. Stephen Peek, Esq. Bryce K. Kunimoto, Esq. Jessica E. Whelan, OLLAND & HART LLP Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants Aruze Gaming America, Inc. and Kazuo Okada


Jay J. Schuttert, Esq., David W. Gutke, Esq., EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT LLP, Bruce R. Genderson (pro hac vice), David M. Krinsky (pro hac vice), Adam D. Harber (pro hac vice), WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants David S. Krakoff (pro hac vice), Lauren R. Randell (pro hac vice), Adam Miller (pro hac vice) Preston Burton (pro hac vice) BUCKLEY LLP

KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP, Jeffrey S. Love (pro hac vice), Kristin L. Cleveland (pro hac vice), Caroline L. Desmond (pro hac vice), Ryan L. Frei (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant Aruze Gaming America, Inc J. Stephen Peek, Esq. Bryce K. Kunimoto, Esq. Jessica E. Whelan, OLLAND & HART LLP Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants Aruze Gaming America, Inc. and Kazuo Okada

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT ARUZE GAMING AMERICA, INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF UNIVERSAL ENTERTAINMENT CORP. TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE RESPONSE TO AGA'S INTERROGATORY NO. 16 (FIRST REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that the time for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Universal Entertainment Corporation (“UEC”) to file its Opposition to Defendants/Counter-Claimant Aruze Gaming America, Inc.'s Motion to Compel UEC to Provide a Complete Response to AGA's Interrogatory No. 16 (“Motion to Compel,” filed on October 14, 2022 - ECF No. 610) is extended fourteen (14) days, from October 28, 2022 to November 11, 2022. This is the first request for extension of time for UEC's Opposition to the Motion to Compel.

This extension request is necessary to provide counsel additional time to evaluate the allegations associated with the Motion to Compel and to provide additional time to prepare and coordinate the Opposition with Japanese-based clients. Accordingly, for good cause showing, the parties have agreed to the foregoing extension.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Universal Entm't Corp. v. Aruze Gaming Am., Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 27, 2022
2:18-CV-00585 (RFB)(NJK) (D. Nev. Oct. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Universal Entm't Corp. v. Aruze Gaming Am., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNIVERSAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 27, 2022

Citations

2:18-CV-00585 (RFB)(NJK) (D. Nev. Oct. 27, 2022)