Opinion
2:18-cv-00585-RFB-NJK
10-04-2022
UNIVERSAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation, Plaintiff, v. ARUZE GAMING AMERICA, INC. a Nevada corporation, KAZUO OKADA, an individual, Defendants. ARUZE GAMING AMERICA, INC., a Nevada corporation, KAZUO OKADA, an individual, Counter-Claimants, v. UNIVERSAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation, ARUZE USA, a Nevada corporation, and JUN FUJIMOTO, an individual, Counter-Defendants.
J. Stephen Peek, Esq. (1758) Bryce K. Kunimoto, Esq. (7781) Jessica E. Whelan (14781) Erica C. Medley (13959) HOLLAND & HART LLP Attorneys for Defendants Aruze Gaming America, Inc. and Kazuo Okada Jeffrey S. Love, Esq. (pro hac vice) Kristin L. Cleveland, Esq. (pro hac vice) KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP Attorneys for Defendant Aruze Gaming America Inc
J. Stephen Peek, Esq. (1758)
Bryce K. Kunimoto, Esq. (7781)
Jessica E. Whelan (14781)
Erica C. Medley (13959)
HOLLAND & HART LLP
Attorneys for Defendants Aruze Gaming America, Inc. and Kazuo Okada
Jeffrey S. Love, Esq. (pro hac vice)
Kristin L. Cleveland, Esq. (pro hac vice)
KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant Aruze Gaming America Inc
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS MADE AVAILABLE TO THE SPECIAL INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE
(SECOND REQUEST)
IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that the deadline for Defendants/Counter-Claimants Aruze Gaming America, Inc. and Kazuo Okada to file their Reply in Support of their Motion to Compel Documents Made Available to the Special Investigation Committee (ECF No. 556) (“Motion to Compel”), filed on August 22, 2022, ECF No. 556, is extended, from October 4, 2022 to October 13, 2022. This is the second stipulation for extension of time for the Reply.
This extension request is necessary to provide counsel additional time to evaluate the allegations and exhibits associated with the Motion to Compel and related Opposition, and to provide additional time to prepare these filings with Japanese-based clients, particularly in light of the fact that the Opposition was filed while counsel was taking depositions in this matter in Hawaii. Accordingly, and for good cause showing, the parties have agreed to the foregoing extension.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.