Opinion
04-21-00115-CV
11-04-2021
UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD, Appellant v. Valerie REDUS, Individually, and Robert M. Redus, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Cameron Redus, Appellees
From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014-CI-07249 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
ORDER
PER CURIAM
On October 29, 2021, appellees filed an opposed motion for leave to file sur-reply brief. Appellees' motion is GRANTED.
On October 19, 2021, this appeal was submitted on briefs. Appellant has filed a motion to grant oral argument. The motion is opposed by appellees. After considering the motion and examining the briefs, appellant's request for oral argument is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.1(c), (d) (explaining that oral argument is not required if the court, after examining the briefs, decides that oral argument is unnecessary because "the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record" or "the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument").
It is so ORDERED.