From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Unity Plan Finance Company, Inc. v. Glaser

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans
Dec 2, 1935
164 So. 259 (La. Ct. App. 1935)

Opinion

No. 16024.

December 2, 1935.

Appeal from City Court of New Orleans; Wm. V. Seeber, Judge.

Jos. J. Ritayik, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Friedrichs, Connolly Simoneaux, of New Orleans, for appellee.



This is a suit for $93.90, the balance due on a promissory note issued under the Small Loan Act, Act No. 7 of the Extra Session of the Legislature of the year 1928. The makers of the note, Andrew J. Glaser and Ernest Senac, defendants, in their answer admit their signature, but deny liability upon the ground that the note is tainted with usury, in that the charge for the use of the money exceeds 42 per cent. per annum, the maximum amount allowed under the Small Loan Act.

There was judgment below in favor of plaintiff, as prayed for, and defendants have appealed.

All questions presented by this appeal have been settled adversely to the contention of defendants in the matter of Unity Plan Finance Company, Inc., v. William Green et al., 179 La. 1070, 155 So. 900.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Unity Plan Finance Company, Inc. v. Glaser

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans
Dec 2, 1935
164 So. 259 (La. Ct. App. 1935)
Case details for

Unity Plan Finance Company, Inc. v. Glaser

Case Details

Full title:UNITY PLAN FINANCE COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Andrew J…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans

Date published: Dec 2, 1935

Citations

164 So. 259 (La. Ct. App. 1935)