From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Unitrin Direct Ins. Co. v. Beckles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 24, 2020
188 A.D.3d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

12480 Index No. 153706/18 Case No. 2020-02090

11-24-2020

UNITRIN DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Alan Dennis BECKLES, M.D., et al., Defendants, Jules Francois Parisien, M.D., et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Goldberg, Miller & Rubin P.C., New York (Eli Shmulik and Harlan R. Schreiber of counsel), for appellant. The Rybak Firm PLLC, Brooklyn (Maksim Leyvi of counsel), for respondents.


Goldberg, Miller & Rubin P.C., New York (Eli Shmulik and Harlan R. Schreiber of counsel), for appellant.

The Rybak Firm PLLC, Brooklyn (Maksim Leyvi of counsel), for respondents.

Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa A. Crane, J.), entered on or about November 1, 2019, which denied summary judgment on plaintiff's first cause of action for a declaration disclaiming coverage for no-fault benefits sought by defendants-respondents Jules Francois Parisien, M.D. and SP Orthotic Surgical & Medical Supply, Inc., unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion granted, and it is declared that plaintiff has no coverage obligation for no-fault benefits sought by the defendants-respondents. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Where, as here, the insurer submits evidence of a medical provider claim (NF–3), the timely request for an independent medical examination (IME) of the injured claimant within 15 days of the receipt of that claim, and the injured claimant is a no-show at two duly noticed IMEs, the basis for disclaimer of coverage is established, as a matter of law, and summary judgment is properly awarded to the insurer with respect to further coverage obligations and reimbursement of outstanding medical bills with respect to all treating providers (see Kemper Independence Ins. Co. v. Adelaida Physical Therapy, P.C., 147 A.D.3d 437, 46 N.Y.S.3d 579 [1st Dept. 2017] ; National Liab. & Fire Ins. Co. v. Tam Med. Supply Corp., 131 A.D.3d 851, 16 N.Y.S.3d 457 [1st Dept. 2015] ),


Summaries of

Unitrin Direct Ins. Co. v. Beckles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 24, 2020
188 A.D.3d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Unitrin Direct Ins. Co. v. Beckles

Case Details

Full title:Unitrin Direct Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alan Dennis…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 24, 2020

Citations

188 A.D.3d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
188 A.D.3d 620
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 6974

Citing Cases

Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. Duff

But the triggering date that begins the IME-request period is not receipt of the NF-2 benefits application,…

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Access Med. Diagnostic Sols.

After receiving one or more of these verification forms ("NF-3 forms"), the insurer must request "any…