United Technologies Corporation v. Groppo

2 Citing cases

  1. Fadner v. Commissioner of Revenue Services

    281 Conn. 719 (Conn. 2007)   Cited 44 times
    Observing that "recoupment has been employed by our courts as a tool of equity despite statutes of limitations since at least the nineteenth century, particularly in contract and probate disputes"

    (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) United Technologies Corp. v. Groppo, 220 Conn. 665, 681, 600 A.2d 1350 (1991).

  2. Gabrielle v. Hospital of St. Raphael

    33 Conn. App. 378 (Conn. App. Ct. 1994)   Cited 97 times
    Holding extension ineffective to revive action when already untimely

    It must be expressed in unequivocal language." United Technologies Corp. v. Groppo, 220 Conn. 665, 680, 600 A.2d 1350 (1991); Nor'easter Group, Inc. v. Colossale Concrete, Inc., 207 Conn. 468, 481, 542 A.2d 692 (1988). To adopt the interpretation of 52-190a(b) urged upon us by the plaintiff would constitute a substantial and radical departure from the legislative mandate of creating a finality to causes of action.