From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Statesr v. Mogler

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 15, 2021
No. CV-20-00173-PHX-SPL (D. Ariz. Oct. 15, 2021)

Opinion

CV-20-00173-PHX-SPL CR-15-01118-PHX-SPL

10-15-2021

United States of America, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jason Todd Mogler, Defendant/Movant.


ORDER

Honorable Steven P. Logan United States District Judge.

Movant Jason Todd Mogler has filed an Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“Motion”) (Docs. 16, 18). The Honorable Deborah M. Fine, United States Magistrate Judge, has issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Court deny the Motion (Doc. 62). Judge Fine advised the parties that they had fourteen (14) days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R (Doc. 62 at 57-58). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 6, 72; United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not… require any review at all… of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken. The Court will adopt the R&R and deny the Motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1. That Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 62) is accepted and adopted by the Court;
2. That the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (CV-20-00173-PHX-SPL, Doc. 16; CR-15-01118-PHX-SPL, Doc. 735) is denied without an evidentiary hearing;
3. That this case is dismissed with prejudice;
4. That a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied;
5. That the Clerk of Court shall file this Order in the underlying related criminal action, Case No. CR-15-01118-PHX-SPL; and
6. That the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action.


Summaries of

United Statesr v. Mogler

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 15, 2021
No. CV-20-00173-PHX-SPL (D. Ariz. Oct. 15, 2021)
Case details for

United Statesr v. Mogler

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jason Todd Mogler…

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Oct 15, 2021

Citations

No. CV-20-00173-PHX-SPL (D. Ariz. Oct. 15, 2021)