From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Zuniga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 23, 2011
CASE NO. 2:09-cr-0095 EJG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:09-cr-0095 EJG

08-23-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CESAR ADRIAN ZUNIGA aka Christian Beltran, and LUIS ZUNIGA GARCIA Defendants.

BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney Scott N. Cameron, for Heiko P. Coppola Assistant U.S. Attorney Scott N. Cameron Counsel for Luis Zuniga-Garcia DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender Scott N. Cameron, for Jeffrey Staniels Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant CESAR ADRIAN ZUNIGA


SCOTT N. CAMERON

Attorney at Law

1007 7th Street, Suite 319

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 442-5230

Attorney for:

LUIS ZUNIGA-GARCIA

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND NON

EVIDENTIARY HEARING DATE, AND

EXCLUDING TIME

Stipulation

The parties, through undersigned counsel, stipulate that the briefing schedule for the filing and determination of defendants' motion to suppress evidence and motion to dismiss for violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments may be continued according to the dates listed below. On July 13, 2011, the defendants received pre-plea criminal history reports from the Probation Department as ordered by this Court. Counsel for defendants have actively been meeting with their respective clients and are working to settle this matter prior to filing the above-stated motion. The parties desire to continue the briefing schedule and non-evidentiary hearing date of the motion to provide time to attempt to settle the case. As such, the parties stipulate that the briefing schedule and non-evidentiary hearing date may be rescheduled as follows:

Defendants' Moving Papers: September 23, 2011
Government's Opposition: October 21, 2011
Defendants' Optional Reply: November 4, 2011
Non-evidentiary Hearing and
Evidentiary Hearing Setting: November 18, 2011 at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED THAT time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act be excluded pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D) & (h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv), Local Codes E and T-4. The parties agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

The parties have authorized the defense counsel for Luis Zuniga-Garcia to sign this stipulation on their behalf.

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

by Scott N. Cameron, for

Heiko P. Coppola

Assistant U.S. Attorney

by Scott N. Cameron

Counsel for Luis Zuniga-Garcia

by DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

Scott N. Cameron, for

Jeffrey Staniels

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

CESAR ADRIAN ZUNIGA

Order

For the reasons stated in the above stipulation of counsel, the briefing schedule and non-evidentiary hearing date stipulated to by counsel is hereby ordered.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded from the date of the execution of this stipulation through November 18, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare], Local Code T4, and 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(1)(D), Local Code E (commencing with the filing of motions).

Edward J. Garcia, Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

United States v. Zuniga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 23, 2011
CASE NO. 2:09-cr-0095 EJG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Zuniga

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CESAR ADRIAN ZUNIGA aka Christian…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 23, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:09-cr-0095 EJG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)