From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Zinnel

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
2:21-mc-00098-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-mc-00098-TLN-AC

09-20-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN ZINNEL, Defendant.


ORDER

Troy L Nunley, United States District Judge

Defendant-debtor Steven Zinnel (“Defendant”) proceeds in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On July 20, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 89.) Third-party claimant David Zinnel filed objections to the findings and recommendations on July 26, 2021. (ECF No. 98.) On August 3, 2021, the United States also filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 101.)

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 20, 2021, are ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 43) is DENIED.

3. Defendant's request for an evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 20) is DENIED.


Summaries of

United States v. Zinnel

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
2:21-mc-00098-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Zinnel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN ZINNEL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 20, 2021

Citations

2:21-mc-00098-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)