From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Zapien

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
CASE NO. 2:09-CR-358 WBS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:09-CR-358 WBS

10-11-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE OLIVERA ZAPIEN, et.al. Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DATE: October 7, 2011 HEIKO P. COPPOLA Assistant U.S. Attorney MICHAEL PETRICK Attorney for Defendant Jose Olivera Zapien GILBERT ROQUE Attorney for Defendant Ramiro Suarez RUBEN MUNOZ Attorney for Defendant Adolfo Valencia Alvarez OLAF HEDBERG Attorney for Defendant Jose Quintero Fernandez CLEMENTE JIMENEZ Attorney for Defendant Jose Moreno Gutierrez TIM PORI Attorney for Defendant Erik Aguilar Lara


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

HEIKO P. COPPOLA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO EXCLUDE TIME

The parties request that the status conference in this case be continued from October 11, 2011 to November 21, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. They stipulate that the time between October 11, 2011 and November 2011 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv)and Local Code T-4. Specifically, all defense counsel need additional time to review the discovery provided and investigate the case. Well over 2000 pages of discovery and 80 CD's containing video, audio recordings and photographs have been provided to the defense counsel to date. Defense counsel are still reviewing approximately 1200 new pages of discovery provided by the government in January 2011. Further, the parties are actively engaged in plea negotiations and it is anticipated this time period will aide in the resolution of this case for a number of parties. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

Respectfully Submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DATE: October 7, 2011

HEIKO P. COPPOLA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

MICHAEL PETRICK

Attorney for Defendant Jose

Olivera Zapien

GILBERT ROQUE

Attorney for Defendant Ramiro

Suarez

RUBEN MUNOZ

Attorney for Defendant Adolfo

Valencia Alvarez

OLAF HEDBERG

Attorney for Defendant Jose

Quintero Fernandez

CLEMENTE JIMENEZ

Attorney for Defendant Jose

Moreno Gutierrez

TIM PORI

Attorney for Defendant Erik

Aguilar Lara

SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Zapien

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
CASE NO. 2:09-CR-358 WBS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Zapien

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE OLIVERA ZAPIEN, et.al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:09-CR-358 WBS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)