Opinion
22-6910
02-24-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRONE YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.
Tyrone Young, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Patrick Jones, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia; Kari Kristina Munro, FRITH, ANDERSON &PEAKE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: February 21, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (4:18-cr-00017-JPJ-1)
Tyrone Young, Appellant Pro Se.
Jonathan Patrick Jones, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia; Kari Kristina Munro, FRITH, ANDERSON &PEAKE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Young appeals the district court's order denying his motion for leave to supplement his motion for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(b) and 59(e). We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Young, No. 4:18-cr-00017-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. Aug. 1, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED