From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Young

United States District Court, Western District of New York
Mar 31, 2022
No. 21-CR-6010L (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2022)

Opinion

21-CR-6010L

03-31-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FREDERICK B. YOUNG, Defendant.


DECISION AND ORDER

DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge.

All pretrial motions were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Marian W. Payson pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Defendant filed two pro se motions: (1) a motion to dismiss for the insufficiency of the Indictment and (2) a motion to dismiss for violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161.

Judge Payson issued a thorough, 14-page Report and Recommendation on February 17, 2022 (Dkt. #63), recommending that the motions be denied.

Appointed counsel duly filed an objection (Dkt. #68) to the Report and Recommendation, relying on the pro se motions and counsel's supplemental submissions.

I have reviewed the Report and Recommendation which lays out the lengthy procedural history of the case and sets forth authority supporting Judge Payson's recommendation.

I accept and adopt the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #63). I find no basis to alter or modify it. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, I DENY defendant's motions to dismiss for insufficiency and motions to dismiss for violations of the Speedy Trial Act. (Dkt. #39, #54, #56, #62).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Young

United States District Court, Western District of New York
Mar 31, 2022
No. 21-CR-6010L (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Young

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FREDERICK B. YOUNG, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of New York

Date published: Mar 31, 2022

Citations

No. 21-CR-6010L (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2022)