From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Yost

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 14, 2011
No. 1:10-cr-00090 AWI (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:10-cr-00090 AWI

09-14-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEPHANIE YOST, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender FRANCINE ZEPEDA, Bar #91175 Assistant Federal Defender CHARLES J. LEE, Bar #221057 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service Attorneys for Defendant STEPHANIE YOST


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

FRANCINE ZEPEDA, Bar #91175

Assistant Federal Defender

CHARLES J. LEE, Bar #221057

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorneys for Defendant

STEPHANIE YOST

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE JURY TRIAL


JUDGE: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the jury trial in the above-captioned matter now set for October 18, 2011, may be continued to January 24, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. Trial confirmation now set for October 3, 2011, may be continued to January 9, 2012. The parties also agree that the deadline for defendant Yost to accept the plea offer of the government is extended until December 20, 2011, at 5:00 p.m. A signed plea would need to be submitted to the government by that date and time.

This continuance is at the request of counsel for defendant. Counsel needs further time for proper preparation of the case for trial. Counsel has experienced delays in the preparation of the case. First, the defendant continues to suffer significant medical setbacks. These setbacks affect her ability to participate in the preparation of her defense. Counsel has obtained voluminous bank records in this case and needs additional time to review them, to consult with an expert in employment, as well as complete other ongoing investigation.

Ms. Yost's medical condition has previously been discussed and counsel is willing to discuss additional details with the Court and the government if requested.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

MARK J. MCKEON

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

FRANCINE ZEPEDA

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorneys for Defendant

STEPHANIE YOST

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv). IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Yost - Stipulation and Order
to Continue Jury Trial


Summaries of

United States v. Yost

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 14, 2011
No. 1:10-cr-00090 AWI (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Yost

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEPHANIE YOST, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 14, 2011

Citations

No. 1:10-cr-00090 AWI (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)