From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Yasin

United States District Court, District of New Jersey
Jul 6, 2021
21-6021 (DEA) (D.N.J. Jul. 6, 2021)

Opinion

21-6021 (DEA)

07-06-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMIL J. YASIN

Tim Anderson, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Ian D. Brater Assistant U.S. Attorney


Tim Anderson, Esq. Counsel for Defendant

Ian D. Brater Assistant U.S. Attorney

CONTINUANCE ORDER

HON DOUGLAS E. ARPERT, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of Rachael A. Honig, Acting United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (by Ian D. Brater, Assistant U.S. Attorney), and defendant JAMIL J. YASIN (by Tim Anderson, Esq.) for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter from the date this Order is signed through October 4, 2021; and the Court having previously entered Standing Orders 20-02, 20-03, 20-09, 20-12, extensions of Standing Order 20-12, and Standing Order 21-04, continuing this and all other criminal matters in this district until June 1, 2021, in response to the national emergency created by COVID-19; and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have the matter submitted to a grand jury within 30 days of the date of his arrest pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b); and no prior continuances having been entered; and the defendant, through his attorney, having consented to the continuance; and for good and sufficient cause shown, IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons:

(1) The parties have entered into a plea agreement and are requesting additional time in which to schedule the plea hearing, which will render trial of this matter unnecessary;

(2) In response to the national emergency created by COVID-19, the Chief Judge of this Court has entered Standing Orders 20-02, 20-03, 20-09, 20-12, extensions of Standing Order 20-12, and Standing Order 21-04, which are incorporated herein by reference;

(3) The defendant has consented to the aforementioned continuance;

(4) The grant of a continuance will likely conserve judicial resources; and

(5) Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7), the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on this 6th day of July, 2021, ORDERED that this action be, and it hereby is, continued from the date this Order is signed through October 4, 2021; and it is further

ORDERED that the period from the date this Order is signed through and including October 4, 2021 shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.


Summaries of

United States v. Yasin

United States District Court, District of New Jersey
Jul 6, 2021
21-6021 (DEA) (D.N.J. Jul. 6, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Yasin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMIL J. YASIN

Court:United States District Court, District of New Jersey

Date published: Jul 6, 2021

Citations

21-6021 (DEA) (D.N.J. Jul. 6, 2021)