From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wygovsky

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 29, 2022
21 Cr. 718 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2022)

Opinion

21 Cr. 718 (JGK)

09-29-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEAN WYGOVSKY, Defendant.

DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York DANIEL TRACER Assistant United States Attorney SEAN WYGOVSKY ANTHONY M. CAPOZZOLO, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC


DAMIAN WILLIAMS

United States Attorney for the

Southern District of New York

DANIEL TRACER

Assistant United States Attorney

SEAN WYGOVSKY

ANTHONY M. CAPOZZOLO, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant

Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT

JOHN G. KOELTL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about November 22, 2021, SEAN WYGOVSKY (the “Defendant”), was charged in a two-count Information, 21 Cr. 718 (JGK) (the “Information”), with securities fraud, in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j (b) & 78ff; Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b- 5; and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2 (Count One); and wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2 (Count Two);

WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Counts One and Two of the Information, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461, of any and all property, real and personal, that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information, that the Defendant personally obtained;

WHEREAS, on or about September 29, 2022 the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Information and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C), and Title 28 United States Code, Section 2461(c) a sum of money equal to $4,300,000 million in United States currency, representing the proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information the Defendant personally obtained;

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $4,300,000 million in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney, Daniel Tracer of counsel, and the Defendant, and his counsel, Anthony M. Capozzolo, Esq., that:

1. Asa result of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $4.3 million in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, SEAN WYGOVSKY, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment into the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

8. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Wygovsky

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 29, 2022
21 Cr. 718 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Wygovsky

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEAN WYGOVSKY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 29, 2022

Citations

21 Cr. 718 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2022)