United States v. Wright

Full title: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant v. Michael WRIGHT and Randall Wright.

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

684 F.3d 1360 (3d Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 10–3552.

2012-07-11

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant v. Michael WRIGHT and Randall Wright.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Nos. 5:09–cr–00270–001 & 5:09–cr–00270–002), District Judge: Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel. Zane D. Memeger, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant. Mark S. Greenberg, Esq., Lacheen Wittels & Greenberg, Philadelphia, PA, for Michael Wright.

THEODORE A. McKEE

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Nos. 5:09–cr–00270–001 & 5:09–cr–00270–002), District Judge: Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel.
Zane D. Memeger, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant. Mark S. Greenberg, Esq., Lacheen Wittels & Greenberg, Philadelphia, PA, for Michael Wright.
Michael N. Huff, Esq., Philadelphia, PA, for Randall Wright.

Present: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

THEODORE A. McKEE, Chief Circuit Judge.

Upon further consideration, this Court concludes that rehearing en banc is not necessary in the above-captioned case. Accordingly, the order of this Court, dated July 6, 2012, ordering rehearing en banc is hereby vacated.