From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 25, 2020
Case No. 3:19-cr-005-LRH-WGC (D. Nev. Aug. 25, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 3:19-cr-005-LRH-WGC

08-25-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY WRIGHT, Defendant.


FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. Defense counsel needs additional time to continue review of discovery material related to Sgt. Carry and to conduct research to determine whether there are any pretrial issues that must be litigated, whether this case will go to trial, or whether it can be resolved through negotiations.

2. Mr. Wright is out of custody and does not object to this continuance.

3. The parties agree to the continuance.

4. The additional time requested herein is not sought for the purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for the defendant sufficient time to effectively and thoroughly investigate and prepare Mr. Wright's defense.

5. The additional time requested by this stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A), and considering the factors under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and 3161(h)(B)(iv) in that failure to grant this continuance would result in a miscarriage of justice by denying counsel for the Defendant reasonable time necessary for effective preparation.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for trial, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

The continuance sought herein is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), when the considering the facts under Title 18, United States Code, §§ 316(h)(7)(B) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that trial briefs, proposed voir dire questions, proposed jury instructions, and a list of the Government's prospective witnesses must be electronically submitted to the Court by the 7th day of December, 2020, by the hour of 4:00 p.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the calendar call currently scheduled for September 17, 2020, at 8:30 a.m., be vacated and continued to December 3, 2020 at 1:30 p.m.; and the trial currently scheduled for September 29, 2020, at the hour of 8:30 a.m., be vacated and continued to December 14, 2020 at 8:30 a.m.

DATED this 25th day of August, 2020.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 25, 2020
Case No. 3:19-cr-005-LRH-WGC (D. Nev. Aug. 25, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY WRIGHT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 25, 2020

Citations

Case No. 3:19-cr-005-LRH-WGC (D. Nev. Aug. 25, 2020)