United States v. Wright

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN WRIGHT, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 24, 2015

Case No. 2:14-cr-357-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Sep. 24, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 2:14-cr-357-APG-VCF

09-24-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN WRIGHT, et al., Defendants.

ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AMENDED ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION ¹ (Dkt. #95)

1 This amended order corrects a typographical error in my September 2, 2015 order (Dkt. #112). The original order, at line 17, referenced Dkt. #62. That reference should have been to Dkt. #72. --------

Magistrate Judge Ferenbach issued a Report & Recommendation recommending denial of defendant Brian Wright's motion to dismiss (Dkt. #72), denying Wright's motion to compel (Dkt. #70), and deferring to me a decision on Wright's motion to sever (Dkt. #71). (Dkt. #95.) Wright filed an objection. I have conducted a de novo review of the Report & Recommendation and related papers. Judge Ferenbach's Report & Recommendation sets forth the proper legal analysis and factual bases for the decision. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Ferenbach's Report & Recommendation (Dkt. #95) is ACCEPTED. Wright's motions to dismiss (Dkt. #72) and his motion to compel (Dkt. #70) are DENIED. I will decide Wright's motion to sever (Dkt. #71) after the government submits its Bruton material for in camera review.

Dated: September 24, 2015.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE