From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Woody

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Jan 6, 2017
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06-cr-00040 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 6, 2017)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06-cr-00040

01-06-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JASON ALLEN WOODY, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ORDER

Pending before the Court is a motion, brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), to reduce Defendant's sentence based on a subsequent reduction in the applicable sentencing guideline. Pending before the Court is a motion, brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), to reduce Defendant's sentence based on a subsequent reduction in the applicable sentencing guideline. On November 1, 2014, the United States Sentencing Guidelines were amended resulting in reductions in the guidelines in Section 2D1.1. The guideline reduction was given retroactive effect. Pursuant to the order entered on September 8, 2015, this case was designated for Standard consideration.

The Court has received the original Presentence Investigation Report (PSI), original Judgment and Commitment Order and Statement of Reasons, plea agreement, and addendum to the PSI from the Probation Office, and received any materials submitted by the parties on this issue and finds that the Defendant is a career offender, and, therefore is not eligible for a sentence reduction.

Although the Defendant is currently ineligible because he is a career offender, the Court notes that the law regarding career offenders is currently the subject of much litigation and could change. Thus, if a determination is ever made that this Defendant is no longer considered a career offender, the Court will entertain a motion by the Defendant to reconsider the ruling in this order. --------

Based on the foregoing considerations, the Court finds that the Defendant is ineligible for a sentence reduction based on the 2014 amendments to U.S.S.G. § 2D.1.1. Accordingly, Defendant's motion [ECF 79] for a sentence reduction is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Defendant and counsel, the United States Attorney, the United States Probation Office, and the United States Marshal.

ENTER: January 6, 2017

/s/_________

THOMAS E. JOHNSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Woody

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Jan 6, 2017
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06-cr-00040 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 6, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Woody

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JASON ALLEN WOODY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION

Date published: Jan 6, 2017

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06-cr-00040 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 6, 2017)