From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Woodson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 31, 2019
Case No. 4:16CR541AGF(SPM) (E.D. Mo. Jan. 31, 2019)

Summary

denying defendants' motion to suppress evidence obtained from the use of a cell-site simulator authorized by a pen register

Summary of this case from Jones v. United States

Opinion

Case No. 4:16CR541AGF(SPM)

01-31-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN WOODSON, TYRONE L. WILLIAMS, TERRY T. WILLIAMS, and HAROLD WILLIAMS, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS

This matter is before the Court on the motions of Defendants Justin Woodson, Tyrone L. Williams, Terry T. Williams, and Harold Williams to Suppress Title III Wire Intercept Electronic Surveillance Evidence, Justin Woodson's Supplemental Motion to Suppress Other Electronic Surveillance Evidence, and Tyrone Williams' Supplemental Motion to Suppress Other Electronic Surveillance Evidence. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the motions were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah.

Defendant Justin Woodson already entered a plea of guilty to certain of the charges. --------

An evidentiary hearing was held on May 30, 2018, at which several law enforcement officers testified. Following the hearing, the parties were permitted to file post-hearing briefs, including a joint sur-reply brief filed by Defendants. On November 21, 2018, Magistrate Judge Mensah filed a Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 639], recommending that the various motions to suppress electronic surveillance evidence be denied. None of the Defendants filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has passed.

After careful consideration of the record, and in light of Defendants' failure to file objections, the Court will adopt and sustain the thorough reasoning of the Magistrate Judge set forth in support of her Report and Recommendation issued on November 21, 2018.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 639] is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Joint Motion to Suppress Title III Wire Intercept Electronic Surveillance Evidence (Doc. 323) be DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Justin Woodson's Supplemental Motion to Suppress Other Electronic Surveillance Evidence (Doc. Nos. 322 & 410) be DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Tyrone Williams' Supplemental Motion to Suppress Other Electronic Surveillance Evidence (Doc. Nos. 324 & 417) be DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion of the United States to Dismiss Counts XX, XXI and XXII of the Indictment as to Justin Woodson (Doc. No. 346), and Count VII of the Indictment as to Tyrone Williams (Doc. No. 354), pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 48(a), is GRANTED.

/s/_________

AUDREY G. FLEISSIG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 31st day of January, 2019.


Summaries of

United States v. Woodson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 31, 2019
Case No. 4:16CR541AGF(SPM) (E.D. Mo. Jan. 31, 2019)

denying defendants' motion to suppress evidence obtained from the use of a cell-site simulator authorized by a pen register

Summary of this case from Jones v. United States
Case details for

United States v. Woodson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN WOODSON, TYRONE L…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 31, 2019

Citations

Case No. 4:16CR541AGF(SPM) (E.D. Mo. Jan. 31, 2019)

Citing Cases

Jones v. United States

While not necessary to the disposition of Movant's motion to reconsider, the Court notes any argument…

In re Warrant Application for use of Canvassing Cell-Site Simulator

Whether CSS use constitutes a Fourth Amendment search presents an interesting and open question on which only…