From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wood

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 12, 2013
13-cr-122 MCE (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2013)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, #122664, Federal Defender, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, $237432 Assistant Federal Defender, Designated Counsel for Service, Sacramento, CA, Attorney for Defendant, STEPHEN WOOD.

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney

          MATT MORRIS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTININUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, MATTHEW MORRIS, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and MATTHEW SCOBLE, attorney for STEPHEN WOOD, that the status conference hearing date of December 12, 2013 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on January 23, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.

         The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, as well as continue negotiations toward resolving the case.

         Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree that the time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including January 23, 2014 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

          ORDER

         UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the December 12, 2013, status conference hearing be continued to January 23, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing there from, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

         It is ordered that time up to and including the January 23, 2014 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Wood

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 12, 2013
13-cr-122 MCE (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Wood

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN WOOD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 12, 2013

Citations

13-cr-122 MCE (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2013)