From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wingo

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 14, 2015
616 F. App'x 61 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-6801

09-14-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HERMAN ROBINSON WINGO, Defendant - Appellant.

Herman Robinson Wingo, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:09-cr-00854-RBH-5) Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herman Robinson Wingo, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Herman Robinson Wingo appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Wingo, No. 4:09-cr-00854-RBH-5 (D.S.C. Apr. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Wingo

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 14, 2015
616 F. App'x 61 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Wingo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HERMAN ROBINSON WINGO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 14, 2015

Citations

616 F. App'x 61 (4th Cir. 2015)