From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Winfield

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 20, 2023
No. 22-7209 (4th Cir. Jan. 20, 2023)

Opinion

22-7209

01-20-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERT LEE WINFIELD, JR., a/k/a Tubbs, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert Lee Winfield, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: January 17, 2023

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (2:95-cr-00193-REP-1; 2:07-cv-00529-REP)

Robert Lee Winfield, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Robert Lee Winfield, Jr., appeals the district court's order construing his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment as an unauthorized, successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction.[*] Our review of the record confirms that the district court properly construed Winfield's Rule 60(b) motion as a successive § 2255 motion over which it lacked jurisdiction because he failed to obtain prefiling authorization from this court. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(A), 2255(h); McRae, 793 F.3d at 397-400. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order.

Consistent with our decision in United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003), we construe Winfield's notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. Upon review, we conclude that Winfield's claims do not meet the relevant standard. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). We therefore deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

[*] A certificate of appealability is not required to appeal the district court's jurisdictional categorization of a Rule 60(b) motion as an unauthorized, successive § 2255 motion. United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 400 (4th Cir. 2015).


Summaries of

United States v. Winfield

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 20, 2023
No. 22-7209 (4th Cir. Jan. 20, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Winfield

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERT LEE WINFIELD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 20, 2023

Citations

No. 22-7209 (4th Cir. Jan. 20, 2023)