From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wilson-Bey

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 11, 2022
2:21-cr-00306-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cr-00306-GMN-NJK

10-11-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EMERALD WILSON-BEY, Defendant.


ORDER [Docket No. 105]

NANCY J KOPPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is a letter from Defendant. Docket No. 105. In that letter, Defendant indicates that she seeks a new attorney. See id. at 2 (“I do not want to use the CJA or FPD attorneys” (emphasis in original)). This letter was sent on September 28, 2022, see id. at 1, 3, but Defendant subsequently represented that she did not seek new counsel, Docket No. 103 (filed on September 29, 2022). Accordingly, any request in the letter related to obtaining new counsel is DENIED as moot.

With respect to any other relief requested in the letter, it is not properly before the Court. Given that Defendant has counsel, relief must be sought through the filings of her attorney. See, e.g., Local Rule IA 11-6. Accordingly, any such request is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Wilson-Bey

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 11, 2022
2:21-cr-00306-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Wilson-Bey

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EMERALD WILSON-BEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 11, 2022

Citations

2:21-cr-00306-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2022)