From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2012
2:08-CR-00114-LKK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)

Opinion

2:08-CR-00114-LKK

07-13-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEFAN A. WILSON, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney DAVID W. KLAUDT Attorney for Petitioners (Signature retained by attorney)


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

R. STEVEN LAPHAM

KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the United States

AMENDED STIPULATION AND

ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE REGARDING

PETITION FOR ADJUDICATION OF

THE VALIDITY OF INTEREST IN

PROPERTY BY RICHARD A. GRAY,

JR., GRAY INVESTMENT

PARTNERS, AND CUMBERLAND

HILL CAPITAL, LP.


Old Date: July 17, 2012, at 9:15 a.m.

New Date: September 11, 2012 at 9:15 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Kevin C. Khasigian, Assistant United States Attorney, and counsel for petitioners Richard A. Gray, Jr., Gray Investment Partners, Cumberland Hill Capital Fund, LP, David W. Klaudt, that:

1. The status conference currently set for July 17, 2012, at 9:15 a.m., with the Court's approval, be continued to September 11, 2012 at 9:15 a.m. to allow those parties notified by the United States in late May and/or early June 2012 to file a petition under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(2).

2. In late May and early June 2012, the United States effected notice to certain victim/investors who could potentially trace their investments to the seized funds.

3. Since that time, at least one of Wilson's victim/investors has expressed an interest to retain counsel and investigate the merits of pursuing a petition under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n).

Respectfully Submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: __________________

KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

____________________

DAVID W. KLAUDT

Attorney for Petitioners

(Signature retained by attorney)

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2012
2:08-CR-00114-LKK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEFAN A. WILSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 13, 2012

Citations

2:08-CR-00114-LKK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)